Tips and traps for acquiring SMSF assets from related parties
Acquiring assets from related parties can be a minefield, but some SMSF practitioners continue to struggle with the basics.
In certain scenarios (e.g. when an SMSF winds up and its assets end up in different SMSFs), it’s not always clear whether a fund is acquiring assets from a related party.
Unfortunately, transferring the assets from the fund being wound up into the new one without taking the SMSF rules into account could be disastrous. You may inadvertently be breaching Section 66 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), which deals with acquiring assets from a related party.
It’s important that all dealings between related parties are done at arm’s length, and in conjunction with the fund’s investment strategy.
A related party of an SMSF can be:
- all members of your fund
- associates of fund members, including:
- the relatives of each member
- the business partners of each member
- any spouse or child of those business partners; any company a member (or the members or their associates) controls or influences; and any trust the member (or the members or their associates) controls
- standard employer sponsors (i.e. employers who contribute to an SMSF) under an arrangement between the employer and a trustee of your fund
- associates of standard employer sponsors, including:
- business partners and companies or trusts the employer controls (either alone or with their other associates)
- companies and trusts that control the employer.
A relative of a member can be:
- a parent, grandparent, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, lineal descendant or adopted child of the member or their spouse
- a spouse of any individual specified above
(Interestingly, a cousin isn’t classified as a related party.)
Remember, the only assets a fund can intentionally acquire from a related party (such as a former SMSF) are:
- money or cash
- listed shares
- business real property.
All acquisitions must be done at market value. So items such as business real property should be valued at least three months before the acquisition, just to be safe.
To make things even less cut and dried, various exceptions can be applied.
The 5 per cent IHA Rule
Any non-permitted asset (e.g. shares in a company that’s a related party) can be acquired as long as it doesn’t make the SMSF exceed the 5 per cent permitted level of in-house assets. (These shares are acquired when the trustee of the new SMSF becomes the owner of the shares.)
Providing the acquisition is done at market value, the exception applies to all assets, including units in related unit trusts and superannuation funds.
If the asset is acquired at less than market value, the difference between the two values should be recorded as a contribution.
Relationship breakdown
If there’s a relationship breakdown, an SMSF’s assets can be transferred to/acquired by another SMSF without breaching S66.
However, to get the green light, rules within the Family Law Act 1975 must be applied. For example, you’d need a divorce order for a marriage breakdown, and evidence of property settlement proceedings for a de facto relationship breakdown.
Last asset standing
Under S66(2C) of the SIS Act, a fund can acquire an asset from a related party if it’s acquired under a merger between super funds. Under these limited circumstances, there may be scope to transfer a non-permitted asset to another fund that’s winding up via a rollover.
Here’s an example: If the last asset standing in the wind-up fund isn’t permitted, but the fund can only be closed by transferring it to the new fund, then it may be seen as a merger between the two funds.
Important note: This rule isn’t a 'Get out of jail free' card to get past the legislation. Get it wrong, and you could be facing fines and other penalties from the ATO. So be careful, and make sure you document everything before you head down this path.
As you can see, acquiring assets from related parties can be a bit of minefield. And you need to tread carefully to make sure you don’t breach any SIS rules.
Shelley Banton, director, SuperAuditors
Wednesday 20 May 2015
Columnist: Shelley Banton
www.smsfadviseronline.com.au
Hot Issues
- 2024 Year End Tax Planning Guide (Part 1)
- Medicare levy surcharge OR basic health insurance ?
- ATO warns of ‘serious penalties’ for unlawful tax scheme promoters
- ACCC scam report
- Employees taking more sick days - and it's getting worse
- Foreign residents selling property in Australia
- How much does negative gearing really cost – an overview and an opinion?
- The Shortest-reigning Monarchs in History
- FBT Reminder – Odometer Reading
- ATO’s debts on hold campaign prompts new IGTO guidance
- A comprehensive collection of small business benchmarks
- The 2025 Financial Year tax & super changes you need to know!
- Underperforming employees: When can you terminate?
- A comprehensive list of guides to industry specific tax deductions.
- ‘Renewed concerns’ about economy sees consumer sentiment dip: Westpac
- Oldest Buildings in the World.
- Small businesses may ‘collapse under strain of payday super’, IPA warns
- ATO’s hands tied with scrapping on-hold debts, expert says
- What Drives Your Business Growth and Profits?
- Australian Taxation Office (ATO) shifting to firmer debt collection activity
- Why employee v contractor comes down to fine print
- Sharing economy reporting regime for platform operators
- Countries producing the most solar power by gigawatt hours
- Illegal access nets $637 million
- Accessing superannuation benefits.
- Does your business have a company Power of Attorney?
- Labor tweaks stage 3 tax cuts to make room for ‘middle Australia’
- GrantConnect
- 2 in 3 SMEs benefit from instant asset write-off, survey reveals
- Updated guidance on R&D claims
- Do you know how to recover debts?
- Wheat Production by Country
- Vimeo test
Article archive
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
- January - March 2015
- October - December 2014
April - June 2015 archive
- SMSFs may be missing out on allowable deductions
- Change to Early Access Rules
- Capital Gains Tax – which year?
- Checklist for Employers Year-end
- Year-end Tax Planning – Small Business
- Year-end Tax Planning – Trusts
- Reminders and Tax Strategies for SMSFs pre-year end
- Year-end Tax Planning – Individuals
- Tips and traps for acquiring SMSF assets from related parties
- Overtime Payments May Eliminate Claims for Unfair Dismissal
- ACCC issues scam warning
- SME Dispute Resolution
- Land Tax – Victoria
- R&D incentives at risk
- ATO adds ‘hot issue’ to its SMSF target list
- Additional Super Contributions Not Appropriate for all
- Issues arising from an underpaid pension
- Salary and Superannuation after the death of an employee
- IPA calls for zero pc tax rate
- Australian Government - Budget 2015
- Budget 2015 - some professional opinions
- Looming end to SMSF Borrowings?
- ATO warns SMSFs on franking credits scheme
- Lump Sum Payments - Employer Reporting
- Small business tax cuts 'not enough', says IPA
What our clients say about us