ATO warns of ‘serious penalties’ for unlawful tax scheme promoters
The ATO is targeting unlawful tax and super scheme promoters, citing “serious” penalties and reputational risk.
.
The ATO has released an update on its website, claiming it will continue to target those who promote unlawful tax schemes.
“Anyone who promotes unlawful tax schemes is taking big risks. They risk our attention, serious penalties, as well as their reputation,” it said, adding, “They’re also risking their client’s money for their own financial gain.”
The Tax Avoidance Taskforce is responsible for targeting the promotion of unlawful tax schemes among practitioners “regardless of the firm size, occupation, position in their organisation, or standing in the tax community.”
The promoter penalty laws prevent the promotion of unlawful tax and super schemes or schemes that differ materially from their described operation in a product ruling.
By way of penalty, the courts can impose the greater of 5,000 penalty units for an individual, 25,000 penalty units for a body corporate, or twice the consideration received or receivable by the entity or its associates by operation of the scheme whether directly or indirectly.
In 2021, the Federal Court handed down the largest penalty issued under the promoter laws, totalling $22.68 million.
Paul Enzo Boggiato and entities within his control were penalised for “systemic abuse” of the research and development tax incentive scheme.
“The size of the penalty is the highest ever seen in Australia and reflects the scale and abusive nature of these schemes,” said ATO assistant commissioner Ash Khera.
“Those who encourage others to do the wrong thing and claim the incentive to which they are not entitled will be caught and held to account for their actions.”
That case built on a series of ATO victories which involved applying the promoter penalty laws, such as the Federal Court decision of the Commissioner of Taxation v Rowntree and others in which three advisers were ordered to pay a total of $9.4 million.
“We have the tax technical and investigative skills to deal with those who promote non-compliance with the tax and superannuation system,” said Khera.
Last year, the ATO announced it had filed an application to the Federal Court against a former EY partner who had allegedly promoted a tax exploitation scheme.
According to the ATO, the former partner promoted three tax loss access schemes to seven clients between November 2016 and April 2021.
The news of the Tax Commissioner’s case against the former partner was first reported by The Australian Financial Review and became a major issue in the Senate consulting inquiry.
“If proven, these allegations will provide stark evidence of the failure of regulation in the sector. Once again, we ask the question, ‘Is this just the tip of the iceberg?’” Pocock said to the AFR.
“The ATO alleges that the illegal activity was conducted for seven clients and the partner in question is reported to be claiming that others at the firm were involved,” she said.
While the former partner’s identity has yet to be revealed, EY successfully applied to vary a suppression order that had prevented it from being named as the former employer of the scheme promoter.
In a statement, EY revealed the partner had been terminated for cause in August 2022 after disclosing they had received more than $700,000 in unauthorised financial benefits connected to the schemes.
While EY stated the Commissioner had made no allegations of wrongdoing against the firm itself, it did enter into an enforceable voluntary undertaking to improve its internal processes, training, and notification activities.
David Larocca, chief executive at EY Oceania, said the allegations related to the “isolated actions of a rogue operator and are in no way reflective of the way we do business.”
“We fell short in this instance, and I regret that we didn’t identify and stop this behaviour earlier.”
The ATO said tax advisers should be aware of the warning signs of unlawful tax schemes, report suspected unlawful schemes, advise clients against involving themselves in unlawful schemes, and encourage implicated clients to work with the ATO.
Nick Wilson
17 April 2024
accountingtimes.com.au
Hot Issues
- Time for a superannuation check-up?
- Scam alert: fake ASIC branding on social media
- Millions of landlords the target of expanded ATO crackdown
- Government urged to exempt small firms from TPB reforms
- ATO warns businesses on looming TPAR deadline
- How to read a Balance Sheet
- Unregistered or Registered Trade Marks?
- Most Popular Operating Systems 1999 - 2022
- 7 Steps to Dealing With a Legal Issue or Dispute
- How Do I Resolve a Dispute With My Supplier?
- Changes to Casual Employment in August 2024
- Temporary FBT break lifts plug-in hybrid sales 130%
- The five reasons why the $A is likely to rise further - if recession is avoided
- June quarter inflation data reduces risk of rate risk
- ‘Bleisure’ travel claims in ATO sights, experts warn
- Most Gold Medals in Summer Olympic Games (1896-2024)
- Estate planning considerations
- 5 checklists to support your business
- Are you receiving Personal Services Income?
- What Employment Contracts Does My Small Business Need?
- The superannuation changes from 1 July
- Hasty lodgers twice as likely to make mistakes, ATO warns
- Landlords who ‘double dip’, fudge deductions in ATO crosshairs
- Most Spoken Languages in the World
- Tax Time Checklists - Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
- Compare your business
- 2024 Year End Tax Planning Guide (Part 2)
- ATO to crack down on rental income, WFH deductions this tax time
- How to Draft a Standard Form Contract
Article archive
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
- January - March 2015
- October - December 2014
April - June 2024 archive
- Tax Time Checklists - Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
- Compare your business
- 2024 Year End Tax Planning Guide (Part 2)
- ATO to crack down on rental income, WFH deductions this tax time
- How to Draft a Standard Form Contract
- GST, PAYG withholding a ‘significant portion’ of $50bn tax debt
- ATO changes will make it harder for over 42,000 small businesses.
- The Deadliest pandemics in History
- Budget breakdown – Federal Government Analysis
- Winners & Losers
- Federal Budget 2024
- 2024 Year End Tax Planning Guide (Part 1)
- Medicare levy surcharge OR basic health insurance ?
- ATO warns of ‘serious penalties’ for unlawful tax scheme promoters
- ACCC scam report
- Employees taking more sick days - and it's getting worse
- Foreign residents selling property in Australia
- How much does negative gearing really cost – an overview and an opinion?
- The Shortest-reigning Monarchs in History
- FBT Reminder – Odometer Reading
- ATO’s debts on hold campaign prompts new IGTO guidance
- A comprehensive collection of small business benchmarks
- The 2025 Financial Year tax & super changes you need to know!
- Underperforming employees: When can you terminate?
- A comprehensive list of guides to industry specific tax deductions.
- ‘Renewed concerns’ about economy sees consumer sentiment dip: Westpac
- Oldest Buildings in the World.
- Vimeo test
What our clients say about us